Volume 12, Issue 1 (Paramedical Sciences and Military Health (Spring 2017) 2017)                   Paramedical Sciences and Military Health 2017, 12(1): 39-49 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , vsaba@aut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5772 Views)

Introduction: Eye lens is a very sensitive organ to the x-ray radiation and cataract could be formed as a result of eye exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is one of the main exposure sources in clinical situations and brain imaging delivers high amount of exposure to the eye lens. To reduce eye lens dose, efficient dose reduction methods have to be developed and implemented. In this paper, the efficiency of two methods including gantry tilting and kVp reduction, have been studied for eye lens dose reduction.
Methods and Materials: A 64-slice CT scanner was modeled to evaluate the eye lens dose in different scanning arrangements using MCNPx. To study the effect of kVp reduction and gantry tilting on the Lens dose magnitudes, three tube voltages including 100, 120 and 140 kVp and three gantry tilts including 0, 15 and 30 degrees were simulated and studied.
Results: The results showed that the lens dose considerably decreased by tube voltage decreasing and gantry tilt increasing.
Discussion and Conclusion: From the results, it could be concluded that low tube voltage and gantry tilting are effective and simple methods for lens dose reduction in CT scan.

Full-Text [PDF 4202 kb]   (2615 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: full articles
Received: 2017/05/10 | Accepted: 2017/05/20 | Published: 2017/06/18

References
1. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
2. Dowd SB, Tilson ER. Practical radiation protection and applied radiobiology: WB Saunders; 1999.
3. Eye lens is more vulnerable to radiation: new studies 2011.
4. Picano E, Vano E, Domenici L, Bottai M, Thierry-Chef I. Cancer and non-cancer brain and eye effects of chronic low-dose ionizing radiation exposure. BMC cancer 2012;12(1):1-13.
5. Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, Fujiwara S, Akahoshi M, Mishima HK, et al. Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiation research 2007;168(4):404-8.
6. Mettler Jr FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Studies in the United States and Worldwide: Frequency, Radiation Dose, and Comparison with Other Radiation Sources—1950–2007 1. Radiology 2009;253(2):520-31.
7. Medicine TAAoPi. Adult Routine Head CT Protocols Version 2.0. Maryland, United States: The American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2016;1:1-20.
8. Zakariaee SS, Saba V. A Mathematical Head Phantom for Dosimetry Measurements by Monte Carlo Method. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health 2016;11(3):12-20. [Google Scholar]
9. Liu H, Liu T, Xu X, Wu J, Zhuo W. Eye Lens Dose Reduction From CT Scan Using Organ Based Tube Current Modulation. Medical physics 2015;42(6):32-50.
10. Lai C, Cheung H, Chan T, Wong T. Reducing the radiation dose to the eye lens region during CT brain examination: the potential beneficial effect of the combined use of bolus and a bismuth shield. Radioprotection 2015;1(1):1-18.
11. Zhang D, Cagnon CH, Villablanca JP, McCollough CH, Cody DD, Stevens DM, et al. Peak skin and eye lens radiation dose from brain perfusion CT based on Monte Carlo simulation. American journal of roentgenology 2012;198(2):412-7.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.